Skip to main content
PYRAMYD

PYRAMYD Field Report · October 2026

The state of enterprise software competitive intelligence, 2026.

Five findings drawn from the PYRAMYD Product Graph — 250K+ products across 2,546 categories, 2.4M+ aggregated reviews, and 2,000+ signal sources. Every figure comes from a read-only query run on 8 October 2026.

5 findings250K+ products2.4M+ reviewsMeasured 8 Oct 2026

The headline finding

The enterprise software market is more crowded, more concentrated and faster-moving than most category maps show. Buyers write about a few products, most rivals go unreviewed, and the vendors you track change something every few days.

Five findings

What the graph actually shows.

Finding 01

34

vendors in the median category

The market is more crowded than most maps show.

Across the 2,546 enterprise software categories in the graph, the median category has 34 vendors with a product in it. One in twenty has more than 300, and 271 categories have 200 or more. A category map with a handful of named rivals describes the top of the market, not the market.

Finding 02

89.7%

of review volume on the top 10% of products

Buyer attention piles onto a few products.

The top 10% of products by review count hold 89.7% of all review volume. Of the 106,868 products with any reviews, 97,288 have fewer than 100. Competitive intelligence that leans on reviews alone is thinnest exactly where most competitors live.

Finding 03

24%

of categories are vertical industry software

Vertical software is a quarter of the map and a sliver of the reviews.

620 of the 2,546 categories (24%) are vertical industry software. They hold 40,684 products, 16.5% of the products in a category, but only 8.4% of review volume. If you compete in healthcare, financial services, legal or construction software, your rivals are less reviewed and harder to see.

Finding 04

75×

more reviews per vendor for 4+ product vendors than single-product ones

Multi-product vendors draw the reviews.

Vendors with four or more products average 1,198 reviews; single-product vendors average 16. Only 4,839 of 181,515 vendors sell four or more products, yet they are the ones buyers write about, so tracking a rival means tracking its whole portfolio, not one product page.

Finding 05

3 days

median gap between material signals for top vendors

Competitors change something every few days.

For the 30 of the top 100 vendors (by review volume) with tracked product, pricing, partnership, leadership, release or integration signals, the median gap between one such signal and the next is 3 days, across 744 gaps. A battlecard refreshed once a quarter is out of date for most of its life.

Methodology

How we computed these numbers.

Every figure traces back to a read-only query against the Product Graph, run on 8 October 2026. The SQL is available on request.

  • Data source: the PYRAMYD Product Graph (250K+ products, 2,546 categories, 2.4M+ reviews, 2,000+ signal sources), measured on 8 October 2026 with read-only queries
  • Vendors per category: distinct vendors with a visible product in each category
  • Review concentration and review volume: the review counts on product listings across review sites (10.3M in all; 8.5M for products in a category), with products ranked into ten equal groups; the 2.4M figure counts reviews stored one by one
  • Vertical software: categories whose market category is Vertical Industry Software in the PYRAMYD category taxonomy
  • Multi-product vendors: vendors grouped by their number of visible products, with review counts summed per vendor
  • Signal cadence: days between consecutive product, pricing, partnership, leadership, release and integration signals for each of the top 100 vendors by review volume
  • Schema: 91 node types; the industry taxonomy is crosswalked to ISIC, NAICS and SIC, and to GICS where a match exists

Run these queries against your own category.

Book a 30-minute demo. We'll filter the same five queries to your specific category and walk through what changes when CI is grounded in a live graph instead of a quarterly slide deck.